Sub Navigation

Practice Notes

Freedom of Information (FOI) Practice Notes are issued by the Department of Justice as part of its whole of government coordination role to provide guidance in the operation of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (the Act). These Practice Notes are guidelines intended to promote consistency of approach in responding to FOI applications. FOI practitioners are, of course, independent decision makers exercising statutory responsibilities under the Act. FOI Practice Notes are intended to assist all departments and agencies subject to the operation of the Act. 

Please select a Practice Note:

Practice Note 1: Requests for Access

A valid request must be:

  • in writing - not verbal;
  • accompanied by an application fee of 2 fee units, which, since 1 July 2009, is $23.40 (unless waived or reduced because of hardship);
  • sufficiently clear to enable the agency to conduct a thorough and constructive search for the documents sought.

There is an obligation on Freedom of Information Officers to assist an applicant to lodge a valid request. Reasonable assistance ought to be provided to enable an applicant, acting reasonably, to make a valid request.

Practice Note 2: Fees and Charges

An application fee must accompany a request for access (unless waived or reduced on hardship grounds) for it to be valid.  Access charges cannot be imposed or must be waived in some particular circumstances (eg routine requests).  Access charges are otherwise payable for search time, inspection, and copies or other forms of access. 


Special rules apply for some individuals or circumstances (e.g. impecunious applicants seeking documents containing information about their personal affairs). 


Estimate access charges as soon as possible after receiving a valid request.  A deposit must be sought from an applicant if estimated access charges exceed $50.00. 


Apply access charges consistently between applicants, subject to certain exceptions.

Practice Note 3: Deletion of Irrelevant Material

Material irrelevant to a request for access must be deleted if:

  • it is reasonably regarded as irrelevant to the request;
  • it is practicable to edit a copy document to delete the irrelevant material;
  • the terms of the request itself or the applicant subsequently indicates a wish to receive such edited documents.

Any decision to delete irrelevant material must be notified to the applicant in a statement of reasons.

Take an overall view of the request and the context in which it is made when determining whether the material would reasonably be regarded as irrelevant to the request.

Practice Note 4: Multiple Requests for Access

Multiple requests arise where a number of applications for access are made by or on behalf of a person at the same or within a short period of time (e.g. within 2-3 weeks).


If there is sufficient commonality between the requests, they can be considered as a single request to determine whether it is a 'voluminous' request under section 25A(1).


Each request should otherwise be treated individually, in the usual way.


If it is not reasonably possible to notify a decision to the applicant on each request within 45 days, subject to the Freedom of Information Act, take practical steps to consult with the applicant about priority of requests and to possibly reduce their scope.

Practice Note 5: Constructive Possession of Documents

An applicant's right of access to documents of an agency is determined by whether documents are in the possession of an agency.

A document is in the possession of an agency if it is in the actual physical possession of an agency.

Possession also arises if the document is in the 'constructive' possession of the agency. (Constructive possession exists where the agency has a right and power to deal with or control the documents.)

Whether constructive possession exists depends on each case.

Practice Note 6: "Voluminous" Requests For Access

A 'voluminous' request is one where the processing of the request would substantially and unreasonably divert the agency's resources from its other operations.

A decision to refuse access on this basis cannot be made unless a written notice is given to the applicant inviting consultation to narrow the request, giving a reasonable opportunity to consult and explaining how the request is 'voluminous'.

Whether a request is a 'voluminous' one depends on the facts of each case and cannot be arbitrarily determined.

The resources to be considered are the existing resources of the agency reasonably required to process the request consistent with attendance to other priorities.

Practice Note 8: Decision Letters

An applicant's right of access to documents of an agency is determined by whether documents are in the possession of an agency.

A document is in the possession of an agency if it is in the actual physical possession of an agency.

Possession also arises if the document is in the 'constructive' possession of the agency. (Constructive possession exists where the agency has a right and power to deal with or control the documents.)

Whether constructive possession exists depends on each case.